Tendring Colchester Borders Garden Community Development Plan Document (DPD)

Search representations

Results for Prof Anthony Vickers search

New search New search

Object

Tendring Colchester Borders Garden Community Development Plan Document (DPD)

GC POLICY 1: LAND USES AND SPATIAL APPROACH

Representation ID: 45

Received: 05/06/2023

Respondent: Prof Anthony Vickers

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The green links, indicated in this section, should have a defined width no less than 100m and should have specified tree preservation and woodland/nature conservation management specifications.

Change suggested by respondent:

The green links should have a defined width no less than 100m and should have specified tree preservation and woodland/nature conservation management specifications.

Full text:

The green links indicated in this section are not defined in terms of a width, and I understand that the width will be left to the discretion of the developers. These green links are the only internal green boundaries between the three communities, and as such should be defined in terms of a width of at least 100m. In particular the Crockleford community, the only existing community within the broad development area, is only been granted an unspecified 'green link', separating it from the northern community. This is far below the green buffers being afforded to Wivenhoe and Elmstead, communities outside the broad search area.

The area within the proposed 100m wide green links should also have specified tree preservation and woodland/nature conservation management specifications.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.