Tendring Colchester Borders Garden Community Development Plan Document (DPD)
Search representations
Results for Sir Bob Russell search
New searchObject
Tendring Colchester Borders Garden Community Development Plan Document (DPD)
GC POLICY 1: LAND USES AND SPATIAL APPROACH
Representation ID: 217
Received: 26/06/2023
Respondent: Sir Bob Russell
Legally compliant? No
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
- The Link Road must come forward at the outset.
- No new development should take place on Salary Brook Valley.
- No new development should be seen from existing communities of Greenstead and Longridge.
The promise - the entire understanding - of the "Tendring Colchester Borders Garden Community" was sold on the promise that a link road would be built between the A134 and the A120.
If that is not going to happen from the outset then I question whether the scheme is legally compliant.
Having all the traffic from the development, as it proceeds over many years, added to the already congested Clinghoe Hill is a travesty of what we have been led to believe would happen.
Without the link road, the development should not be allowed to proceed.
Hitherto my comments have been entirely related to ensuring that the whole of the Salary Brook Valley, the eastern slopes and then beyond easterly, should not be developed AND that no new development should be seen from the existing communities of Greenstead and Longridge on the western side of the Valley.
I seek confirmation that there will be no backtracking on what has been agreed. In view of the breach of promise with the link road, how can anyone trust that the Salary Brook Valley protection - a country park - will happen?
